📰 UP APO Exam Solved Question Paper | Check All 35 MCQs with Answers – Part 2
This is Part 2 of the UP APO (Assistant Prosecution Officer) Exam Solved MCQs series.These cover Indian Penal Code (IPC), CrPC, Evidence Act, and important case laws, all highly relevant for APO, judiciary prelims, and other law competitive exams.
✅ MCQs with Options and Correct Answers (Q.36 to Q.69)
Q36. Shall it be lawful for a police officer to take into custody a person who throws or lays down any dirt, filth, rubbish or any stones on any road or street, which causes inconvenience or annoyance to public?
(A) Yes, even without warrant
(B) Yes, only under a warrant of arrest
(C) No, because it is not an offence
(D) No, because the police officer is not empowered
✔️Answer: (A)
Q37. History-sheet of class A, that is for dacoits, burglars, cattle thieves, railway goods wagon thieves and abettors thereof, may be discontinued with the sanction of—
(A) Superintendent of Police
(B) District Magistrate
(C) Deputy Inspector General of Police
(D) Inspector General of Police
✔️Answer: (A)
Q38. Which of the following entries is not made in the village crime Note-Book Part-I?
(A) Main Castes and Tribals
(B) Specialities of the Population
(C) Entries of offences against the State
(D) The village choukidar
✔️Answer: (C)
Q39. Particulars of which of the following organised gangs should not be entered in the ‘gang register’ of a police station of the district?
(A) Gang of Dacoits
(B) Gang of cattle thieves
(C) Gang to burglars
(D) Gang of railway goods wagon thieves
✔️Answer: (B)
Q40. Is the Investigation Officer bound to reduce in writing any statement made to him in the course of examination under section 161 of CrPC?
(A) Yes
(B) No
(C) Only when directed by the court to do so
(D) Only in cases of cognizable offences
✔️Answer: (B)
Q41. Who among the following is not a public servant?
(A) Chief Minister of a State
(B) Chairman of the Central Board of Film Censors
(C) Surveyor of an Insurance Company
(D) Employee of a ‘Nationalized Bank’
✔️Answer: (C)
Q42. Match List-I (Case) with List-II (Subject):
(a) Kehar Singh Vs. Delhi Administration
(b) Nawab Ali Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(c) Vishwanath Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
(d) Mehboob Shah Vs. Emperor
Options:
(A) 2 4 1 3
(B) 3 1 5 2
(C) 3 4 1 2
(D) 2 1 5 3
✔️Answer: (A)
Q43. ‘A’ attempts to steal jewels by breaking open a box but finds it empty. What offence is committed?
(A) Attempt to theft
(B) Theft
(C) Criminal breach of trust
(D) All of the above
✔️Answer: (A)
Q44. ‘A’ sought to appear in LL.B. exam using forged B.A. mark sheet, but it was detected before exam—
(A) ‘A’ is not guilty of cheating
(B) ‘A’ is guilty of attempt to cheat
(C) ‘A’ is guilty of cheating
(D) None of the above
✔️Answer: (C)
Q45. Which of the following is not correct?
(A) Illness-induced insanity exempts from criminal liability
(B) Intoxication must render accused practically an automation
(C) Voluntary drunkenness is an excuse for knowledge
(D) Compulsion is an excuse except for murder/death
✔️Answer: (C)
Q46. Which is not a meaning of ‘common intention’ under Section 34 IPC?
(A) Prearranged plan
(B) Desire to commit act without contemplating consequences
(C) Mens rea necessary for offence
(D) Evil intent to commit the same offence
✔️Answer: (B)
Q47. In which case necessity under Section 81 IPC cannot be used as a defence?
(A) Self-defence and prevention of violence
(B) Prevent harm at expense of innocent
(C) Self-preservation is absolute necessity
(D) Choice of evils affecting others
✔️Answer: (C)
Q48. Which case held dying declaration unreliable due to no certificate of mental state?
(A) Ravi Chander Vs. State of Punjab
(B) Shripatrao Vs. State of Maharashtra
(C) Uka Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
(D) Baldev Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
✔️Answer: (A)
Q49. The principle of Promissory Estoppel originated—
(A) As an exception to the doctrine of consideration
(B) As a rule of future consideration in contract law
(C) As a rule of past consideration
(D) None of the above
✔️Answer: (B)
Q50. Section of Evidence Act estopping tenant from denying landlord’s title?
(A) 115
(B) 116
(C) 117
(D) None of the above
✔️Answer: (B)
Q51. Which section of IPC incorporates ignorantia juris non excusat?
(A) 78
(B) 76
(C) 79
(D) None of the above
✔️Answer: (B)
Q52. ‘A’, exactly 7 years old, commits an offence. He will—
(A) Not be guilty under Sec. 82 IPC
(B) Be guilty if mature enough
(C) Not be covered by Sec. 82 or 83
(D) Be guilty under Sec. 83
✔️Answer: (C)
Q53. ‘A’ holds ‘Z’ down and takes his money without consent—
(A) Theft
(B) Extortion
(C) Robbery
(D) Dacoity
✔️Answer: (C)
Q54. SC clarified distinction between Section 34 & 149 IPC in—
(A) State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George
(B) Guru Deo Singh v. State of Punjab
(C) Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana
(D) Nanak Chand v. State of Punjab
✔️Answer: (D)
Q55. Which is not necessary for abetment by conspiracy?
(A) Two or more persons
(B) Illegal act in pursuance
(C) Done to achieve conspired object
(D) Abettor must concert with offender
✔️Answer: (D)
Q56. Match the following cases:
(a) Tukaram Vs. State of Maharashtra → 2. Mathura rape case
(b) State Vs. Nalini → 4. Rajeev Gandhi murder case
(c) Barendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Emperor → 3. Post-master murder case
(d) State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukh Deo Singh → 1. Gen. A.S. Vaidya case
✔️Answer: (A) 2431
Q57. If victim also negligent in ‘death by negligence’ case—
(A) No defence available
(B) Contributory negligence is defence
(C) Degree of fault is key
(D) None of the above
✔️Answer: (A)
Q58. Which one is punishable as sedition?
(A) Criticizing govt to overthrow it
(B) Inducing people to disobey laws
(C) Publicly attacking govt policy
(D) Attempt to remove ministers
✔️Answer: (B)
Q59. ‘A’ threatens ‘B’ to burn house if he continues a civil suit. Offence?
(A) Abetment
(B) Criminal assault
(C) Criminal force
(D) Criminal intimidation
✔️Answer: (D)
Q60. ‘A’ instigates a child under 7 to commit murder, which child does alone—
(A) No offence
(B) Causing hurt
(C) Attempt to murder
(D) Murder
✔️Answer: (D)
Q61. SC upheld constitutional validity of Sec 497 IPC in—
(A) Smt. Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
(B) K.M. Nanawati v. State of Maharashtra
(C) Priya Bala Ghosh v. Suresh Chandra Ghosh
(D) Sukhbeer Singh v. State of Haryana
✔️Answer: (A)
Q62. In theft, there must be—
(A) Dishonest intention for any property
(B) Dishonest intention for valuable security
(C) Dishonest intention for movable property
(D) Dishonest intention for immovable property
✔️Answer: (C)
Q63. Which is not assault?
(A) Taking up stick, threatening to beat
(B) “I’ll see you later”
(C) Examining woman without consent
(D) Throwing bricks in house
✔️Answer: (B)
Q64. ‘A’ posts armed guards and stops ‘Z’ from exiting building—
(A) Wrongful restraint
(B) Wrongful obstruction
(C) Wrongful confinement
(D) Wrongful ordering
✔️Answer: (C)
Q65. Which is an illustration of criminal attempt?
(A) Witchcraft to kill
(B) Poison to non-pregnant woman for miscarriage
(C) Takes own umbrella thinking it’s another’s
(D) Goes to buy dyes to counterfeit
✔️Answer: (B)
Q66. ‘A’ knocks out four teeth of ‘B’—
(A) Attempt to hurt
(B) Hurt
(C) Grievous hurt
(D) Attempt to murder
✔️Answer: (C)
Q67. Which is not punishable under IPC?
(A) Preparation to murder
(B) Preparation for dacoity
(C) Preparation to wage war
(D) Preparation for depredation on foreign territory
✔️Answer: (A)
Q68. Minor girl (15) elopes, has sex with ‘Z’. Z liable under—
(A) Sec. 363 IPC
(B) Sec. 366 IPC
(C) Sec. 366-A IPC
(D) Sec. 376 IPC
✔️Answer: (D)
Q69. Assertion (A): Homicide = human killing human.
Reason (R): Homicide is always unlawful.
(A) Both A and R true, R explains A
(B) Both A and R true, R doesn’t explain A
(C) A true, R false
(D) A false, R true
✔️Answer: (C)
🏷 Hashtags:
#UPAPO2025 #JudiciaryPreparation #LawMCQs #IndianPenalCode #CrPC #EvidenceAct #SolvedMCQs #APOExam2025 #LegalUpdates #LawStudentsIndia
Post a Comment